Successful Endeavours - Electronics Designs That Work!

Technology


 The Client Perspective

 What you see depends on which direction you are looking from.

What do you see

How many bars?

If you count from the top, there are 10 bars. But there are only 7 bars when you count from the bottom. In this case it is an optical illusion based on how the drawing is constructed. However in real life the same sort of dilemma faces us as engineers when we are looking at Product Development from the technology perspective and the client is looking at it from the Return On Investment (ROI) perspective.

Roger La Salle makes the case in his book “Think New” that the problem with most new product introductions is not the technology. In general, we engineers will find a solution. The risk that usually kills the product is the business risk or market risk. So our focus as engineers is on making the client successful by getting the product to work technically through Innovation and our skill as engineers, but the client’s biggest risk remains maximised the whole time. The business risk is only dealt with when the product is finally being sold in sufficient quantities to cover the development costs and now return a profit.

Those are 2 very different perspectives. It is worth keeping that in mind the next time you are working on a new product.

The image for today’s blog post was provided courtesy of Dr Marc Dussault, The Exponential Growth Strategist who is always on the look out for examples of antimimeticisomorphism, which I am sure you’ll agree this is!

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2013  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

SEMIP Innovation Showcase 2013

Last week I attended the SEMIP Innovation Showcase at the Hemisphere Conference Centre. This annual showcase is for local technology researchers and developers.

Kees Eijkel

Kees Eijkel of Kennispark

Kees Eijkel of Kennispark

 Kees Eijkel led off with a description of how Kennispark in The Netherlands had fostered cooperation between entrepreneurs, financiers, researchers and industry. It is a 30 year process so far and has shown considerable gains. The key in part to this success is based on a simple approach to evaluating opportunities:

  • focus on the business case
  • decided on a case by case basis and not on a technology focus
  • ideas can come from anywhere, so foster widespread collaboration
  • deal fairly with IP
  • create an environment to leverage talent, investment dollars and facilities
  • measure success by how many jobs are created

He also had some advice for us in Australia where we are just starting on this journey:

  • Public Research Organisations are ready to collaborate, but inexperienced at it
  • Industry recognises the need
  • Government is looking for good ideas
  • We have the STC which could act as the primary cluster to build around

 

STC - Small Technologies Cluster

STC – Small Technologies Cluster

 

And if you haven’t already checked it out, the Australian Synchrotron is an amazing piece of technology. They have regular open days so take advantage of one. I did.

 

The Valley of Death

Next we had a session looking at the funding problem known as “The Valley of Death“. This is the gap in between publicly funded basic research or a private invention stage of technology development, and the successful launch of a market ready product. 

The Valley Of Death - funding the gap

The Valley Of Death – funding the gap

 We had input from Kim Walker of Capstone Partners, Peter Lewis of Hydrix and Bill Matthews of Dulux who shared their experiences in addressing this fundamental problem. The core issues are:

  • inventors and startups have minimal investment funds
  • public funds usually only cover basic research
  • venture capital funds and marketers want a market ready product before they will provide funding

What this usually means is that up to 90% of the funding isn’t available until the product is ready for market. This is the funding needed to get it to that point. It is a classic catch 22.

So how do you fill the void?

The best options presented were:

  • a license or trade sale to the natural owner of the technology is the best option
  • pre-sale agreement from a party who wants to sell the product when it is ready
  • ensure the voice of the market is clear and compelling from the beginning

 

Researchers In Business

 We then had 2 case studies showing successful examples of the CSIRO Researcher In Business program. This is where a researcher directly focuses on a specific industry challenge with a specific client, often operating within their business. The 2 examples were:

Michael Egin of the CSIRO then rounded out the session with his view of how the program works.

 Chief Scientist of Australia

The keynote address was given by Prof. Ian Chubb, Chief Scientist of Australia

Prof. Ian Chubb - Chief Scientist of Australia

Prof. Ian Chubb

He took us through a history of Australia and our slow progress toward scientific and entrepreneurial self-sufficiency. His primary point was that unless we chose to collaborate and cooperate and move beyond the current chasm between academic researchers and private industry operators then we would not be able to progress toward a truly modern economy.

His point closely mirrored the observations by Kees Eijkel that it is only by fostering this collaboration that we can create the jobs and opportunities needed for a vibrant economy.

I’m already convinced. The trick is how to get the ball rolling. I have already had one excellent insight into the problem and one of the main roadblocks. I share that when I’ve got my thoughts fully together. 

SEMIP stands for the South East Melbourne Innovation Precinct.

SEMIP

SEMIP

 Also check out the 2012 SEMIP Inovation Showcase.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years. This post is Copyright © 2013 Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Large Hadron Collider Succeeds

CERN Scientists working through the data gathers from experiments using the LHC  Large Hadron Collider have finished the exhaustive data analysis  and can now confirm that the experiments have confirmed that the Higgs Boson does exist.

Higgs Boson

Higgs Boson

This has a a few ramifications that are all good:

  • It confirms the Standard Model of particle physics is still the basis for our understanding of the universe
  • It resolves some issues with the Standard Model which required the force this particle exerts in order to the equations to work out
  • The Large Hadron Collider has proven its worth
  • We finally have a way to connect gravity with the rest of the forces

Peter Higgs proposed the particle in 1964! It has only taken us 49 years to finally be able to confirm one way or another that he was right. In this case he was. And that is the great dilemma of particle physics. The experiments to differentiate between competing ideas are getting harder and harder to do.

Peter Higgs

Peter Higgs

So just a short post to let you know something momentous has happened in our world.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded SoftwareDevelopment. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years. This post is Copyright © 2013 Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Electronics News Future Awards 2012

Each year in Australia Electronics News give out 7 awards for Electronics Design.  We are very excited to announce that we received 2 of these 7 awards at the Electronics News Future Awards 2012. We are still waiting on official pictures from the awards ceremony held at the Australian Technology Park during the Electronex Exhibition.

The categories we won were:

  • Environment
  • Communications and Networking

 

Electronics Design

Electronics News Future Awards 2012

Environment

For the Environment category the award was for the control, sensing and tracking electronics systems on a combined solar PV and hot water system. The core technology from the client was the concentrated solar PV system which converts sunlight to electricity at a much higher efficiency that normal solar panels. Because it tracks the sun during the day it also delivers more power over the course of the day than a fixed installation can. And because it is concentrated sunlight there is a lot of heat. This heat is used to generate hot water via a heat exchanger system. Its a double win for the environment.

The core Electronics Design and Embedded Software we developed covered the following requirements:

  • Electrical Power Generation monitoring
  • Wireless Telemetry to an In Home Display
  • Heat differential measurements across the heat exchanger to 0.1C
  • Sun position sensing to within 0.1 degrees
  • Gravitic inclination sensing to within 0.1 degrees
  • Solar almanac to allow best effort tracking on overcast days
  • Solar tracking via a Brushless DC motor controller (BLDC)
  • Pump control for the heat exchanger
  • Logging of power and heat energy generation 
Environment Concentrated Tracking PV Solar + Hot Water

Concentrated Tracking PV + Hot Water

Communications and Networking

This was for converting wired timing gates for athletics to a wireless format using low power RF communications to allow the gates to communicate back to a central hub. This project had a lot of technical challenges. The core Electronics Design challenges were:

  • Use of IR through beam detection in full sunlight and without cross talk
  • Timing accuracy to 10msecs
  • Up to 4 sets of gates in operation in range of each other at the same time
  • Long battery life, or low power
  • Maintaining future expansion possibilities

 This follows on from our wins in 2009 for the Analogue Design and Design Software and in 2011 for Industrial Electronics.

The awards ceremony was followed by a round table discussion on Australian Manufacturing which I will cover separately.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years. This post is Copyright © 2012 Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Curiosity Landing

We were an excited bunch of Engineers as we watched the live feed from NASA of the landing of Curiosity on the surface of Mars. Given the telemetry delay of 15 minutes, the real landing had already happened. Here we were looking back in time as we were watching history being made. The tension and excitement were evident in the room and we felt it too.

Curiosity Landing

Curiosity Landing taken from the Mars Orbiter

As a team of Engineers who focus on the delivery of a brand new Electronics Design with the supporting Embedded Software, we know a little of what it is like to fire things up for the first time but celebrate that it didn’t go up in smoke. Not that this happens literally very often, but it is a good feeling to get confirmation that the careful design work has been successfully implemented. We develop up to 100 new Electronics Products each year so we have had some practice at this.

In space this is harder still for 3 reasons:

  • You can’t easily rework it if it goes wrong. It is too hard to get to it. It has to be right.
  • Radiation is much worse and the environment is more demanding. You can’t just use any technology for Aerospace Electronics Development.
  • A lot more investment is at stake.

The celebration when the first telemetry feeds came through as ‘Nominal’ was overwhelming. So this is what it looks like to deliver on $2B of R&D Investment!

Curiosity On Mars after successfully landing

Curiosity On Mars – front leg in view

And thoroughly deserved too. Though the use of ‘Nominal’ for such a great outcome is a little understated. But then this is Engineering and science. We know a little of what that is like though we don’t get to spend that level of investment in creating the future. Certainly the win last year for the Industrial Electronics Future Awards 2011 was a moment we savour.

You can watch the whole landing here:

 

 And some links you will enjoy if you are an enthusiast as I am

Curiosity parachuting to Mars

Curiosities first images

Mars Mt Sharp images

NASA Multimedia gallery

And some other space related posts are at Space.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Positioning

As an Engineer, I have been educated to think in Engineering Concepts. One of the old jokes about education is that it narrows the number of people you can have an intelligent conversation with.

 Today’s blog post image was provided courtesy of Dr Marc Dussault, The Exponential Growth Strategist who is always on the look out for examples of antimimeticisomorphism, which I am sure you’ll agree this is!

Engineering Visualisation

Engineering Visualisation

There is a marketing concept known as Positioning. This refers to the way others perceive you and your offering and how you assist them to understand it. As Engineers we have been very bad at this. The picture above shows that depending on how you look at something, you get a very different impression. From one end it looks like 3 bolts on a bar, from the other is is only 2. This is a trick of course but a cursory glance fools the eye. And so it is with value. If we don’t take the effort to present it well, a cursory look doesn’t show it for what it is.

Creating Value

As an Engineer, I firmly believe we create a tremendous amount of value with the work we do.  The world we live in could not exist without the Engineering Design that made the technology we all take for granted possible. Looking at this from the Engineers‘ perspective, we added a lot of value. But because we don’t explain that, it is taken for granted.

So it is not just necessary to create value, but to Position that value so it is understood as valuable. This builds on  from my post on Creating Value where Edward De Bono is explaing why we are not so good at this.

I attended an IEEE Victoria chapter meeting Monday night and was blown away by the work done at CAWCR, The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, where they model, report and forecast on weather and climate. The presentation was excellent and I appreciated the Engineering and Science behind what they do, but I also reaslised that almost noone knows how hard they work and how smart the technology they create is. They create enormous value, but it is mostly invisble.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

SpaceX Dragon Docks with ISS

It has been a while in the making, but the the SpaceX Dragon capsule has docked with the International Space Station and the beginning of a new era is upon us. Private enterprise is now making deliveries into space.

SpaceX Dragon at the ISS

SpaceX Dragon at the ISS

At 6:56AM on 25 May 2012 the International Space Station grapple attached itself to the SpaceX Dragon craft preparing to dock. This has been a long time in the making and my congratulations go to the team at SpaceX for having made this possible. Designing systems for space is a lot harder than for terrestrial environments and in particular, the increased radiation means you have make sure Electronics Designs are able to handle that and protect themselves from inadvertent state changes as high energy particles penetrate the shielding and deliver directly to tracks, gates and junctions. Aerospace Engineering is just that bit tougher in these environments.

The full story can be read at ISS Welcomes SpaceX Dragon along with a good collection of pictures and a detailed description of the entire process.

Docking was completed at 8:52AM.

SpaceX Dragon Docked with ISS

SpaceX Dragon Docked with ISS

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Aircraft Assembly

Ever wondered what it looks like to make an entire airplane or how much goes into Aerospace Manufacturing?
How about a major passenger liner?

Then you are really going to enjoy this video showing a time lapse of Boeing putting Florida One together…

My thanks again go to  Dr Marc Dussault, The Exponential Growth Strategist for bringing this amazing example of world class Aerospace Manufacturing to my attention. Marc has been our business mentor for the past 3 years and it has made an extraordinary difference to how we run our business.

Although we are an Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development company we also work closely with Mechanical Engineers and Industrial Designers so I appreciate what goes into both the Product Development process as well as the manufacture of something as amazing as a aircraft like this. At one level it is just science and physics, but at another, it is pure magic.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

SEMIP

Today I was at the SEMIP Innovation Showcase 2012. If you aren’t aware, SEMIP is the South East Melbourne Innovation Precinct and aims to improve collaboration between manufacturers in Melbourne’s South East and Research and Innovation providers, principally the CSIRO and the Tertiary Institutes and Universities.

SEMIP

SEMIP

I took some notes and thought I’d share the highlights with you.

Predicting Future Trends

Dr. Stefan Hajkowicz of the CSIRO shared some research findings on future trends from the CSIRO Global Foresight Project. He also did a comparison of Australia and Switzerland looking at what we can learn from a country that has already made the transition we need to make now that we are a high cost economy.

Dr. Stefan Hajkowicz

Dr. Stefan Hajkowicz

The take away message for me on this is that Australia had better focus on making higher value products and providing high quality experiences to our customers. The mining income stream is currently in boom but productivity is declining as we tap out the richest ore bodies and need to work harder to extract new material from poorer ore sites. So we have to make sure we have something of value to offer once that runs out.

Switzerland has positioned itself in a few sectors and is doing very well. Some examples of these sectors are:

  • Chocolate
  • Watches
  • Financial Services
  • Precision Machine Tools
  • Pharmaceuticals

And they have a signature product, the Swiss Army Knife.

One of the Questions raised by Stefan was “What is Australia’s signature product”?  If you have some ideas, please post them as comments. I’m still thinking about that particular question but it would be good to have a list to consider.

Clean Green Technology

There were 3 presenters in this breakout session and 3 very different stories.

Peter Voigt

Peter Voigt

Peter Voight shared the story of Clean TeQ who provide water and air purification products and had to bootstrap their company the hard way, all funded themselves, until they got to the size of going public in 2007. Perter gave an interesting analogy to the current climate debate.

What do you do when the oil warning light on the dashboard of your car comes on while you are driving?

  • do nothing – it probably doesn’t mean anything
  • do nothing – it is a conspiracy by the oil moguls to force you to buy more oil than you need. There isn’t anything really wrong.
  • pull into a service station, get some oil and put it into the vehicle

By implication he suggests that we should all treat the current trend in the environment seriously because ignoring it will lead to a disaster. I agree. We can do much better at looking after this planet than we currently do. And even if the environment does turn out to be less fragile than some fear, reducing pollution and cleaning up our act is the right and best thing to do either way.

Peter also described the process Clean TeQ went through to get up and running and how hard it was. A process he called the “Valley of Death”.

My take away from Peter’s talk was that we need to better support viable and valuable business start-ups in Australia.

Marcel Kamp

Marcel Kamp

Marcel Kamp of Marand Precision Engineering shared about their commercialisation of the CSIRO high efficiency electric motor for solar racers. The CSIRO had an efficiency of 97.4% and Marcel shared how they were able to lift it to 98.3% and also make it a viable product to manufacture.

I’ll skip the engineering details this time because my key take away was that the CSIRO are a valuable and cost effective resource where your need and their projects or capabilities overlap, but you need some persistence with the process. However once you are connected, then other opportunities can flow in both directions. This is a classic SEMIP success story.

Roger Knight

Roger Knight

The final speaker in this session was Roger Knight of AquaDiagnostic.  He shared about their PeCOD technology which came out of the University of Queensland and measures organic pollution levels in water using a process that takes minutes and doesn’t use hazardous chemicals. The standard test takes hours and uses very nasty things like Mercury and Sulphuric Acid. They are now selling test kits and equipment around the world. The technology is manufactured at the STC in Melbourne and protected by patents and meets a need that will only grow in time.

My key take away was that if you have a good idea, you might have to move to the right place in order to get it to market. By moving to the STC, AquaDiagnostics placed themselves in the middle of the cluster of companies, like MiniFab, that became pivotal in their success.

How to build a company

Amanda Gome of SmartCompany then shared her story of leaving her job at BRW to set up SmartCompany, and her philosophy on how to go about it. I was very impressed. Amanda is a passionate and articulate presenter who clearly lives the lessons she shared with us.

Amanda Gome

Amanda Gome

Here is the executive summary:

  • Don’t stuff up the message – stay on message and stay clear
  • Don’t lose focus
  • Innovation must be integral. Don’t be scared of the word – think of it as problem solving.
  • Make it easy for people to buy from you
  • Don’t hate your competitors – some you can make friends and do profitable deals with
  • Don’t be a ‘me too’ – set a high barrier for competitors to have to hurdle
  • Start with enough money
  • Don’t sell yourself cheap – in fact, always look at how to charge more
  • Don’t hire duds – if you do, fire them as quickly as you can
  • Don’t run at a loss
  • Don’t stick your head in the sand – stay aware of news, industry trends, what others are doing
  • You job is to lead and strategise, let others execute
  • Don’t be afraid to offer equity – you will need capital if you build a successful growing company
  • Don’t do old style business plans – constantly review and be agile
  • Don’t be afraid of your staff, empower them and let them get the job done. They should know how to make the decision themselves.
  • Don’t hate nerds. These days we are all technology companies. Embrace it.
  • Don’t burn out. Your greatest value comes from longevity so look after yourself

And Amanda told a funny story about the day she forgot her skirt. The lesson being that things won’t always go well, but deal with it and move on.

My take away is this. If you are going to do it, then do your homework, point it in the right direction, and go for it with courage and conviction.

Doing business with Siemens

Jurgen Schneider then shared how Siemens views the world and how to go about doing business with Siemens. Siemens is huge with 460,000 employees, R&D groups everywhere and $4B in R&D this year. And Siemens has structured its business around the 4 megatrends they identified at the start of this century:

  • Climate Change
  • Demographic Change
  • Urbanisation
  • Globalisation
Jurgen Schneider

Jurgen Schneider

So to engage with them, you have to be able to chow how what you have is relevant to one of their offerings in one of these megatrends. Be specific. Be sure your business pitch is carefully thought out and offers value to the potential partner. And Jurgen gave 6 tips for presenting and for engaging with Siemens:

  • Be unique. You have to offer something they can’t get elsewhere.
  • Remain Persistent. The likelihood you get in front of the best person first time is low in an organisation that big. Keep trying. One ‘No’ means very little.
  • Think Big. Siemens will want it in large quantities if it goes ahead. How will you scale up?
  • Plan for fast growth. Show the plan. Justify it.
  • Prepare for scrutiny. After you get an MOU, the Siemens contracts team will go through you very thoroughly. Prepare for one of your key people to be completely consumed for 6 months by this process.
  • Build on existing friendships and partnerships. Who you already know could be able to introduce you to the right person.

That sounded pretty daunting. But it helps to know in advance. My take away was that if you want a slice of the Siemens pie, you have to be prepared to do what it takes to get that.

Bionic Eye

The final session was on the Bionic Eye project.

Professor Arthur Lowrey

Professor Arthur Lowrey

Professor Arthur Lowrey showed what the project looked like from the Monash University perspective and I was impressed by how practical and pragmatic he and his team were. This is an excellent example of how industry and Tertiary Institutes can collaborate to great effect.

My take away is that you need a team to do a project like this, and there are a lot of elements to that team. This is hard core biomedical and so their are people who will get operated on and have electrodes put inside their skull by surgeons. So it isn’t just electronics and software. Sure there is a lot of that, but it is also all the other things you need to for a project like this.

Erol Harvey

Erol Harvey

Erol Harvey of MiniFab then shared in their role in creating new ways to package the electrodes and electronics that get implanted. This is brand new technology. And the research on this project is being done by each of the 3 partners. This is not a classic University IP sold to an industry partner to commercialise. Everyone is creating new IP.

My take away from Erol’s presentation is that we need to keep advanced manufacturing alive and well in Australia if we want it to remain the country it is today.

Jefferson Harcourt

Jefferson Harcourt

The final presenter was going to be Jefferson Harcourt of Grey Innovation who are doing the PCB, ceramic hybrid and core software design for the product. Unfortunately for us, Jefferson had to leave early as his wife had gone into labour. But it is clear that this is a project in which everyone is pulling their weight big time. I was looking forward to Jefferson’s presentation as we have previously done some business supplying Grey Innovation with specialist R&D services and they handle a very interesting mix of projects.

Government Support For Manufacture

We concluded with a speech from Mark Dreyfus MP in his role as minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.

Mark Dreyfus MP

Mark Dreyfus MP

The government wants forums like SEMIP to succeed and recognise the value of local manufacture. Clean Technology funding will allow local manufacturers to improve their energy efficiency, and that is a good thing. But there isn’t much being allowed for creating the new technologies that will allow that process to continue, or that will result in new products, new companies and new jobs in the region.

My take away from this is that you have to find a way to do it yourserf. The government is not going to fund it for you.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Ideas Worth Pursuing

Matt Barrie

Matt Barrie

BRW recently ran an article by Matt Barrie on business ideas that are worth pursuing. If you haven’t heard of Matt Barrie, he founded Freelancer. In the article he wrote about business ideas that interest him, and what doesn’t interest him. In particular he had a sideswipe at us Engineers about our focus on the technology and solving those problems first instead of testing whether the idea has a viable market. As an Engineer who has had to learn about business in order to run one, I can agree with some of what he said. In particular, we can become so focussd on the technical problem that we don’t make sure there is a real business case for the final product or service.

Here is the short list of what Matt Barrie doesn’t like in a business:

  • Anything that involves selling your personal time – eg. consulting
  • Anything that isn’t scalable – more on that later
  • Anything that requires a technology breakthrough before you have something to sell
  • Small, niche and low total market potential opportunities

By scalable, Matt means that the sales potential is not directly proportional to either people or capital investment. Matt wants leverage. In his words “Businesses that are not scalable are bad“. But is this really the case? And what does he mean by bad?

Is non-scalable always bad?

I agree that if you want to maximise your income potential, the non-scalable businesses will not give you same ability to do that as scalable businesses will. However my business doesn’t only exist to make money. Making money is a byproduct of a good business that is well run and meets a real need. Businesses should make money, otherwise they are not adding enough value or not well enough run.

My favourite business quote is “The purpose of the organisation is for ordinary men and women to come together, and in cooperation with each other, do the extraordinary”!

For me, business is a mechanism to make the world a better place in partnership with others. It is too big a job to do on your own. And it should deliver real value.

There are many essential non-scalable activities out there. Here is a short list:

  • anything to do with the patient side of medical or nursing care
  • most forms of teaching and education
  • personal services
  • mental health
  • government
  • Product Development
  • construction

Notice I said activity. For the quote above also covers the “Not For Profit” sector and Government. Both should deliver real value. They just don’t directly derive their income from that value.

I’m sure Matt Barrie is not upset if he has to see a Doctor just because the Doctor does not have a scalable business.

The final point above is about Product Development. Thomas C. Gale said, ”Good design adds value faster that it adds cost“. So I am not advocating development at any cost. It has to have a value proposition. A client of ours recently told us of a product we designed for them nearly ten years ago that they had made millions of dollars from. Given our fairly modest fees for that project, they got a massive bargain there. That was an example of very good value Product Development which they got a lot of scalable leverage out of.

Product Development uses a mixture of leverage and personal effort. Leverage comes from using existing technology tools to do the work faster. This includes things like:

  • Computer Aided Design and Analysis tools
  • Reference Designs and existing technologies
  • Science and technology understanding already known
  • High Level Design tools and processes
  • Compilers, libraries, components, operating systems, platforms, standards
  • Research findings, existing data, other specialists

The above all came from past work that can be used to make current work more productive or more effective. I started my career laying out PCBs using tape. Now I wouldn’t dream of not using a CAD System. We use Altium Designer for Electronics Design Schematic Capture and PCB Layout. This is much more productive than the manual methods. As part of our ongoing Product Development activities for our clients we design and lay out a new PCB every 2 weeks on average and this is only possible with the use of CAD tools and the full leverage of our experience. In general I don’t want to rediscover the wheel, or the technological equivalent of that, in whatever area of Electronics Design or Embedded Software Development we are working at the moment. I want to take as much advantage of leverage as I can, and only apply the personal effort to what I can’t buy at a reasonable price.

Likewise we use proven Software Development tools that just work every time. It is not a good use of any of my team’s time to be working out why the latest release of something no longer works or breaks a project we had nearly completed. Of course we shouldn’t do that mid project anyway, but the legacy issue still applies. Clients do want updates down the track. So we use IAR tools for our Embedded Software Development. They work, are well supported, and we almost never have an issue of any kind with their performance.

So my conclusion is that non-scalable business activities are essential to modern economies. They just aren’t where the maximum profit potential is.

Let’s take manufacturing. We serve Australian Manufacturers by providing them with the new Electronics Designs they need to either remain competitive, become market leaders or bring a brand new product to the market for the first time. The manufacturing side is scalable although the Australian economy primarily supports lower volume or niche manufacturing opportunities. But once a design is in production and the process is running, they can scale up to meet demand within their capacity.

But our business activities are not scalable. Each design takes at least some personal effort to produce. But if I stop my non-scalable activities, then someone else has to do it. And if everyone does the same, if all the non-scalable activities stop, guess what – the scalable activities also stop!

Freelancer enables the buying and selling of non-scalable activities in a scalable way. It is a great service to those who use it and extremely good value. I agree with Matt Barrie that it is a good business.

Personal effort is still valuable

There is an old joke that goes like this, “No matter how many women you put on the job, it still takes 9 months to make a baby“. Some things cannot be sped up by adding more resources. This analogy works well because we all know this is the case for pregnancy. Many other things are also like this. It will take generations to get peace in some parts of the world. Mindsets cannot be undone overnight. And it takes time to create economic frameworks. Successive Australian governments have spent 50 years working toward an uncompetitive Australian Manufacturing industry. This will not be undone with one policy initiative or one statement of a change of approach. It will take time and personal effort, by those with a vision, to make it happen.

So my belief is that personal effort is not only still valuable, but still essential, even if there are limits to how much I can scale it. I agree with Matt that it isn’t going to make me as rich as his approach will make him, but I’m not just in it for the money. For me, it is not bad, it is essential.

The link to the full article is at Ideas Worth Pursuing.

The twin pillars of modern business are Greed and Ruthless Efficiency according to the Harvard School of Business. If this were an organic process, we would call it cancer. Ultimately it will kill. We need a better model and we need better values. Greed and Fear are the enemies of many a good thing.

And if you were wondering where my favourite business quote comes from, it is from Aristotle, some 380 years B.C.

Want a great career?

And finally, a Ted Talk on “Why You Will Fail To Have A Great Career”! OUCH!  But is it true?

This is an excellent presentation that challenges many of the common assumptions about careers. But there is hope and Larry Smith explains both the challenge and the solution.

Successful Endeavours specialise in Electronics Design and Embedded Software Development. Ray Keefe has developed market leading electronics products in Australia for nearly 30 years.  This post is Copyright © 2012  Successful Endeavours Pty Ltd

Next Page »